
Jamie Neale the British backpacker who cost rescue services $100,000.
The British backpacker Jamie Neale, who spent 12 days surviving in the Australian bush after getting lost on a walk, has reportedly donated just 1.5% of the $200,000 he has subsequently earned, to the State Emergency Services who rescued him.
Grasping Pom Jamie, 19, was on a backpacking holiday in the Blue Mountains area of New South Wales, Australia in July of this year when he went for a stroll in the bush, without his mobile phone, near the town of Katoomba. He was missing for 12 days and his parents had given him up for dead, when he stumbled out of the bush 13 miles from the tourist town where he had set off.
The State Emergency Services spent an estimated $100,000 of tax payers money, in the week long rescue effort to try and locate him.
At the time there was scepticism about how he had survived 12 days in the bush, suffering no more than a few cuts to his upper body. Night temperatures in the bush plunged to freezing, yet Jamie Neale was not found to be suffering from hypothermia. He says he survived by eating seeds and weeds.
Jamie Neale subsequently signed a deal with a celebrity agent who was to tout his story to the highest bidder.
Jamie made $200,000 by recounting his story on the Nine Network’s 60 Minutes program, and he is reported to make even more money with further television deals and possibly even a book deal called Jamie’s 12 Day Diet.
At the time Jamie was said to have stated that part of the deal with Channel Nine was that $100,000 of that money would go into reimbursing the State Emergency Services for the huge rescue operation they launched to find him. Jamie’s father Richard Cass, also stated that he would give any money made from publicity deals to the rescue team or the hospital where Jamie was treated. But today it was revealed that Jamie had donated the measly sum of $1500 to the Blue Mountain SES. That’s just 1.5% of the total it cost Australian taxpayers to rescue him.
In Katoomba from where he vanished, many locals were unimpressed. One resident, Marty Delaney, stated: “If I was overseas and got caught through my own stupidity and the government of that country had to pay for me to be rescued, I would reimburse them.�
Jamie Neale has certainly given the sceptics ammunition for their theories that he faked his disappearance for the publicity and money. This is one grasping Pom that should never have left Britain.
Love Australia? Let us keep you informed...
- Join the Embrace Australia community today. Have your questions answered by our experts, start your own blog, get vital migration information and gain valuable insight from those who have already made the journey.
- Subscribe to our RSS Feed and have all our daily news and features delivered straight to your news reader.
- Join our mailing list -




4 Responses to “Grasping Pom Jamie Neale Pockets Rescue Money”
Comment by Henry — September 17, 2009 @ 4:03 pm
Very selfish behaviour, he should have kept his side of the bargain. If it wasn’t for his stupidity in thinking he could just go for “walkies” in the Australian bush without a mobile phone on him or map, the taxpayer wouldn’t have had to fork out this money to rescue him.
Comment by rr — October 5, 2009 @ 10:26 pm
typical media rubbish and you know what happened cause you personally interviewed him right?? NO so shut up and stop publishing false information get your facts right.
Comment by Lisa Valentine — October 6, 2009 @ 11:01 am
We take our sources very seriously and I can reassure you that the facts in this case were entirely correct.
Comment by Jay — January 29, 2010 @ 1:31 am
Correct that 1600 went to SES, 100k worth of advertising was promised to rescue services. That went to the RFS as the biggest contributer to the search. Then a total of 16k was donated across the various services and hospital which were involved. Look for substantiated claims and not rumours. Along with 200k it was suggested along with 40k 100k 50k and 500k, Which is the correct figure none have officially stated by Jamie or anyone affiliated with him.
Furthermore the SES didnt rescue him, He stumbled across 2 bushwalkers. So you take the facts and sources very seriously when you have recycled rumour and conjecture and made a statement which is easily proven wrong by spending less then a minute on google.
You dont take your sources very seriously