<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian Businesses Warn of Skills Shortages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.embraceaustralia.com/australian-businesses-warn-of-skills-shortages-7445.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.embraceaustralia.com/australian-businesses-warn-of-skills-shortages-7445.htm</link>
	<description>The number one website on Australian immigration, emigrate to Australia with our visa guide, Australia travel guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: R.KH</title>
		<link>http://www.embraceaustralia.com/australian-businesses-warn-of-skills-shortages-7445.htm#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>R.KH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embraceaustralia.com/?p=7445#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>I think ANZSCO 233914 as &quot;Engineering Technologist&quot;(that in a way is equal to previous ASCO 212813 as &quot;Mechanical Engineering Technologist&quot; )which has been clasiffied by DIAC and also is defined as an assessment outcome by Engineers Australia is only a nasty joke. You know,while none of Australian states consider this code in their occupation lists, how migration applicants like me can trust the authenticity of their statements? FYI, none of the responsible agents/departments are eager to clear this ambiguous but simple incongruity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ANZSCO 233914 as &#8220;Engineering Technologist&#8221;(that in a way is equal to previous ASCO 212813 as &#8220;Mechanical Engineering Technologist&#8221; )which has been clasiffied by DIAC and also is defined as an assessment outcome by Engineers Australia is only a nasty joke. You know,while none of Australian states consider this code in their occupation lists, how migration applicants like me can trust the authenticity of their statements? FYI, none of the responsible agents/departments are eager to clear this ambiguous but simple incongruity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanveer</title>
		<link>http://www.embraceaustralia.com/australian-businesses-warn-of-skills-shortages-7445.htm#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanveer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embraceaustralia.com/?p=7445#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>Yet I see many of my friends who immigrated to Australia one year ago, still struggling hard to get a good professional job. I can&#039;t really make anything out of their struggle and these kinda reports of skills shortages. It&#039;s quite contradictory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet I see many of my friends who immigrated to Australia one year ago, still struggling hard to get a good professional job. I can&#8217;t really make anything out of their struggle and these kinda reports of skills shortages. It&#8217;s quite contradictory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Valentine</title>
		<link>http://www.embraceaustralia.com/australian-businesses-warn-of-skills-shortages-7445.htm#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Valentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embraceaustralia.com/?p=7445#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>Hi Carl
Some of the occupations in the article are found on the list, including welders and other metal workers. Here: 
322211
Sheetmetal trades worker
322311
Metal Fabricator
322312
Pressure Welder
322313
Welder (first class)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carl<br />
Some of the occupations in the article are found on the list, including welders and other metal workers. Here:<br />
322211<br />
Sheetmetal trades worker<br />
322311<br />
Metal Fabricator<br />
322312<br />
Pressure Welder<br />
322313<br />
Welder (first class)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carl</title>
		<link>http://www.embraceaustralia.com/australian-businesses-warn-of-skills-shortages-7445.htm#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embraceaustralia.com/?p=7445#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>In this article it says that metal fitters are on the new sol, I cant find it on the list, they are on schedule 4 the sponsored list. so are they really in that much demand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this article it says that metal fitters are on the new sol, I cant find it on the list, they are on schedule 4 the sponsored list. so are they really in that much demand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

